|
Chapter Seven: Group Discussion: Effective Decision Making and Problem Solving
Competent communicators manifest flexibility by exercising both their creativity and their reasoning skills when making decisions and discovering solutions to problems.
Discussion Procedures
Periodic phases of decision emergence
Pooles multiple sequence model of decision emergence.
 Groups move along three activity tracks: Task, relational, topic
 Groups take three principal paths in reaching decisions.
 Unitary sequence-Process in the same step by step fashion
 Complex cycle- -Groups engage in repeated cycles of focusing on the problem, the solution, and back to the problem and so forth.
 Solution Oriented-The group launches into discussion of solutions with little focus on an analysis of the problem.
Functional perspective
 Effective group decision making requires an analysis and understanding of a problem before members search for solutions.
 Effective decision making groups normally engage in creative exploration of unusual, even deviant, ideas during initial discussions
 Following steps in a systematic discussion procedure (standard agenda) in sequential rigid fashion is probably too inflexible for natural discussion to take place.
 Systematic discussion procedures work best when the group decision matters to group members and when members have received training and practice using such procedures.
The Standard Agenda
Systematic procedures
The six steps of systematic procedures in the standard agenda
 Problem of identification.
 Formulate problem into a question of fact, value, or policy
 Problem analysis
 Determine what is problem, how serious it is, what causes the problem
 Solution Criteria
 Standards by which decisions and solutions to problems can be evaluated.
 The group should establish criteria before solutions are suggested.
 Solution Suggestions
 Group brainstorms solutions
 Solution Evaluation and Selection
 Solution Implementation
Closer Look: Murphy's Law
Murphy's law states that anything that can go wrong likely will go wrong--somewhere, sometime, A common mistake made by groups is failure to plan for murphy's law to minimize the chance of error or mishap. During the solution evaluation and selection phase of discussion, groups should address possible mishaps and mistakes.
Problems of implementation
Five primary factors influence our resistance to change in a group
 People are more likely to accept change when they have had a part in the planning and decision making
 Changes are more likely to be accepted if they do not threaten the security of group members
 Changes are more likely to be accepted when the need for change affects individuals directly
 There will be less resistance to change when the change is open to revision and modification
 The three factors (degree, rate, and desirability) affecting a groups ability to adapt to change in a system also affect resistance to change.
When the five conditions are not met, resistance to change and difficulty implementing a group's decision increase.
PERT
Program Evaluation Review Technique is a decision making method that stipulates systematically how to implement small group decisions
The steps in PERT are
 Determine what the final step should look like (e.g.. a no smoking policy for the cafeteria will be instituted.)
 Specify any events that must occur before the final goal is realized (e.g.. the Board of Trustees must endorse the Student Senate decision on banning smoking in the cafeteria)
 Put the events in chronological order
 If necessary, construct a diagram of the process in order to traces the progress of implementation
 Generate a list of activities, resources, and materials that are required between events
 Develop a time line for implementation. Estimate how long each step will take
 Match the total time estimate for implementation of the solution with any deadlines
 Specify which group members will have which responsibilities
Group decision-making rules
Majority rule
 The quality of the group's decision is a particularly troublesome problem with majority rule.
 When decisions are not very important, decisions must be made quickly, and when commitment of all members to the final decision is unimportant, majority rule can be useful.
 Consensus becomes increasingly difficult the larger the group becomes
Minority rule
 This occurs when the group designates an expert to make the decisions
 A designated authority makes the decision for the group
 Executive committees must be delegated responsibility for making certain decisions because the workload for the group as a whole is overwhelming or the time constrains are prohibitive.
Unanimity rule (consensus)
 Consensus is a state of mutual agreement among members of a group where all legitimate concerns of individuals have been addresses to the satisfaction of the group.
 Not all unanimous decisions can be considered a true consensus.
 True consensus requires agreement, commitment, and satisfaction
 Groups that use a consensus approach tend to produce better decisions than groups using other decision rules because full discussion of issues is requires, every group member must be convinced that the decision is a good one, and minority members will be heard.
 Members feel more confident about the correctness of their decisions with consensus and they are more satisfied with the group as a whole.
 Use a " stand aside"- a team member continues to have reservations about the group decision, but when confronted does not want to block the group.
 Avoid conflict-suppressing techniques such as coin-flipping and swapping (I'll support your position this time if you'll support mine next time)
Group Decision Making Rules
Rules
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Majority Rule
|
Quick
Efficient
Expedient in large groups
|
Minorities vulnerable to tyranny of majority
Quality of decision suspect
Usually alienate minority
Under utilization of resources
|
Minority Rule
Designated Expert
Designated Authority
Executive Committee
Forceful Faction
|
Saves time
Clear, Efficient
Divides Labor
Faction may be informed/committed
|
Expertise hard to determine
No group input
Members vie for attention
Members vie to impress authority
Weak commitment to decision
Likely we-not me oriented
|
Unanimity rule
Consensus
|
Quality decisions
Commitment
Satisfaction
|
Time consuming
Difficult
Tension Producing
|
Focus on Culture: Japan's Nuclear Emergency and Consensus Decision Making-- In times of crisis where quick decisive action must be taken to avert catastrophe, deciding by group consensus in inappropriate.
Closer Look: The People vs Juan Corona
Critical Thinking and Effective Decision Making
Gathering information
 Gathering information should be a focused effort by all group members
 The group should divide the labor
Evaluating information
 Information should be
 Credible
 Current
 Relevant
 Representative
 Sufficient is quantity
Participation
Pros and cons of participation
 Involving group members in the decision-making process, especially when decisions affect their lives can be very beneficial
 Participation is not the ultimate remedy for bad decision making
Increasing Constructive Participation
 Encourage contributions from low participants
 Make issues and problems for discussion relevant to the interests of low participants
 Establish a cooperative group climate
 Encourage devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry.
Focus on Culture: Diversity and Participation in Small Groups
 The value of verbal participation in decision making is perceived different from culture to culture
 A relative disadvantage in ability to communicate effectively in groups limits verbal participation of ethnic minorities
 Lackluster participation from ethnic minorities in decision making may result from weak commitment to the group
Closer Look: Conducting Meetings Standard and Technological Forms of Participation
Six common complaints of meetings
 There is an unclear purpose for the meeting
 Participants are unprepared
 Key individuals are absent or late
 Discussions drift into irrelevant conversation on unrelated topics
 Some participants dominate the conversation and stifle discussion
 Decisions made at meetings are not implemented
As the chair, there are several ways you can structure meetings to make them efficient and effective decision-making arenas.
 Don't call a meeting unless there is not good alternative
 Contact every participant
 Prepare a clear agenda and distribute to all participants 3 days or more in advance of the meeting.
 Provide accurate information on issues discussed
 Designate a specific time allotment for every discussion item
 Reserve a few minutes at eh end of the meeting to determine whether the objectives were accomplished
 Distribute the minutes of the meeting as soon as possible.
Creative Problem Solving
General Overview
 Creativity is more perspiration than inspiration
 Creativity is spurred by challenges
 Creativity flourished in cooperative, not competitive environments
 Creativity requires sound ideas not just imaginative ones.
 Creativity requires many ideas
 Creativity requires breaking mindsets and thinking "outside the box"
Specific creative techniques
Brainstorming and nominal group technique
"Encourage Wild Ideas"
Brainstorming is a creative problem solving technique that promotes plentiful even zany ideas in an atmosphere free from criticism with enthusiastic participation.
Guidelines for Brainstorming
|
Don't evaluate ideas while brainstorming
|
Don't clarify or seek clarification of an idea
|
Encourage Zany ideas
|
Expand on ideas of other group members
|
Record all ideas without reference to who contributed the idea
|
Encourage participation of all group members
|
Nominal Group Technique
 Individuals work by themselves generating ideas on a problem
 Group comes together and writes all ideas on the board
 Interaction occurs to clarify ideas
 Individuals select their five favorite ideas, write them on a card, rank from 1 to 5
 Rankings are averaged with the highest averages as ones to be selected by the group.
Research shows that nominal group technique generates more and better ideas than brainstorming.
Proper brainstorming should involve first an individual, then a group, followed by an individual brainstorming session.
Electronic Brainstorming occurs when group members sit at computer terminals and brainstorm ideas using a computer based file sharing program. Electronic brainstorming has sometimes outperformed nominal groups in idea generation.
Framing/reframing
 Our frame of reference can lock us into a mindset, making solutions to problems difficult, if not impossible to discover.
 This strategy has a 70% chance of success or a 30% chance of failure
 If groups get stumped ask "What if..."
Integrative problem solving
Expanding the pie-increasing the resources as a solution to the problem.
Bridging-offers a new option devised to satisfy all parties on important issues.
Making Meetings Work:
Achieving High Quality Group Decisions
by John E. Tropman
Excerpts from the book.
The Rules of Agenda Integrity
There are two integrity rules
1. Deal with all the items on the agenda
2. Do not deal with any items not on the agenda (41)
The Rules of Temporal Integrity
Temporal integrity has three parts
1. Start on time
2. End on time
3. Keep a rough time order interior to the meeting.
Implicitly there is a fourth point,-- do not jerk those members around who have prepared to accommodate the schedule of those who have not prepared.... Meetings need to begin regardless of whether everyone is there or not. (43)
The Rule of Sixths
One sixth of the items (on the agenda) should be from the past, about four sixth should be from the present and about one sixth should be from the future.
The Two-Meeting Rule
"Scheduling items of a controversial nature is so important that is has a subrule of its own--the two meeting rule. When applied in this way the two-meeting rule says that the most controversial items must be discussed first, with no decision at one meeting and must be decided at a subsequent meeting, (The first must is an absolute must; decision is not made when discussion is promised. The second must is a conditional must; we hope for, plan for, expect and encourage decision, but we do not force it. It is in this sense that the must is a conditional one.) The point of this exercise is to let emotions express themselves... The rule of sixths, therefore, allows for the release of emotions, allows people to prepare themselves psychologically for the items coming up, and encourages creativity and the development of good ideas." (17-18)
The Rule of Three-Fourths
The rule of three-fourths is the mail-out rule. At this point, the packet for the upcoming meeting is sent to those who are scheduled to attend. The packet includes three general pieces of information
1. The agenda which includes some useful detail
2. The minutes
3. Reports.
"Almost any topic improves if one has a chance to think about it, and the rule of three fourths is designed to provide that opportunity. Many, many times at meetings we do not have the foggiest idea what is up until we actually arrive and the agenda and reports are passed out. It is not uncommon for people to study a fairly complex document of several pages in length, single spaced with someone putting on pressure, asking, "Well, what do you think?""...(19-20)
The Rule of Two Thirds
"All meetings are divided into three parts--there is the "get-go," the heavy work, and the decompression. If the meeting is only an hour, 20-minute segments become the relevant thirds. In the last third of most meetings, people shift from using both of their hemispheres to one. They allocated the other, unused hemisphere to questions--Will the meeting finish on time? What's for lunch? Are the kids at home trashing the house? Hence the last third of most meetings is a time when most people are emotionally closing down the current situation, although not entirely, and opening themselves up to considerations of what lies ahead. It is, therefore, a suboptimal time to take up key items." (21)
"' Angel's Advocate' a phrase I invented to refer to those individuals who look to the good side, to the positive side, rather than to the negative side when concepts and ideas, especially new ones are expressed. It is a telling point that although we have well-accepted, well-understood phrase for sharing negative views (the devil's advocate), we have no phrase at all for expressing positive views."
Examples:
"Well, there are certainly going to be problems, and we'll get to those in a bit with this proposal. Why don't we start looking at the positives. How could we make it work? And let's get those out so that we have a pretty good sense of the up side of the thing, and then we'll look at the difficulties." The entire climate is changed by that ordering. If one starts discussion of a proposal with the problems, somehow the positives are thought of having to decisively overcome the difficulties." (70)
|